Competitor Mention Monitor
On the schedule you choose, a monitor agent sweeps each competitor's news, reviews, social, comparison pages, and public benchmarks, writes a delta report of only what's new, and updates a competitor-memory document for you to approve.
Saves you ~2.6 h / week
How it works
- Trigger
- On the “Competitor mention sweep” schedule.
- Job
- Sweep each competitor's external signal, diff against memory, write the delta report.
- Outcome
- A verified competitor-mention delta report.
What it installs
Agents 2
-
Mention Monitor
A competitive-intelligence monitor that sweeps news, reviews, social, comparison pages, and benchmarks, and reports only what changed.
-
Competitor Mention Monitor Quality Reviewer
Checks primary evidence, domain controls, deliverable completeness, and communication quality, stopping the run when the work is wrong, unsupported, incomplete, or uncertain.
Teams 1
-
Competitor Mention Monitor quality team
The delivery agents produce the work while an independent quality reviewer checks each workflow handoff against explicit evidence, domain, and communication requirements before the run can continue.
Workflows 1
-
Sweep, diff, report, update, approve
Sweep each competitor's external signal, diff against memory, write the delta report, update the memory document, and hand off for approval.
Documents 2
-
Competitor watchlist
The competitors to monitor and the known surfaces to sweep for each — the editable seed the monitor reads every run.
-
Competitor memory
The running, dated log of observed competitor moves and current per-competitor state the monitor diffs against each run.
Goals 1
-
No competitor move unseen
Material competitor moves — pricing, features, compliance, funding, new comparison pages, and benchmarks — are caught on cadence and turned into a dated, sourced delta against a current competitor memory. Success looks like: Each scheduled run produces an approved delta report of all new, dated, sourced moves since the last run, with the competitor-memory document updated so no material move goes unrecorded.
Skills 2
-
competitor-mention-monitor
Sweep competitors' external signal on a cadence — news, reviews, social, 'X vs Y' comparison pages, and public benchmarks — diff against a running memory document, and report only the dated delta of genuinely new mentions and moves. Adapted from public competitive-analysis methodology.
-
comparison-page-graph
Find new entrants and shifting positioning by parsing the 'X vs Y' comparison-page graph — search comparison queries, extract competitor names from result titles (not just URLs), and surface who is newly positioning against the set. Adapted from public competitive-analysis methodology.
Schedules 1
-
Competitor mention sweep
Runs the competitor mention sweep on the schedule you choose. ## Professional quality control Objective: complete the recurring Competitor Mention Monitor operating cycle and deliver a review-ready, evidence-backed result rather than merely report that the schedule ran. Start by fixing the review period, reading the current source records and prior run, confirming required access, and listing missing or contradictory inputs. Execute the bundle's full authored method in order, retaining source, calculation, command, or before/after evidence for load-bearing findings. Separate facts from interpretation, apply supplied policy without inventing thresholds, and stop any branch that requires missing authority or an unconfirmed human rule. Produce the complete named deliverable plus an evidence record, assumptions, exceptions, unresolved questions, and concrete next actions with owners where the method calls for them. Run the workflow's independent verifier checks and fix failures before requesting approval. The task is done only when every requested section and quality criterion passes or a blocker is explicit; silence, inaccessible data, or polished prose is not proof of completion. Open cited sources, verify that each decisive passage supports the claim, check freshness and provenance, seek disconfirming evidence, and distinguish fact from synthesis. Reject fabricated citations, one-sided conclusions, generic AI phrasing, filler, and confident narrative that outruns the evidence ledger. The human retains authority over publication, sending, spend, signing, merging, deployment, and other consequential external actions.
Folders 1
-
Competitor Mentions
Requirements
- Web search and fetch access for competitor research — The agent researches competitors through worker web search and fetch tools — it searches the web and reads public pages — and pauses for your approval on the delta report.
- Browser access for JS-heavy pages (fallback) — When a competitor's page is JS-heavy or blocks plain fetches, the agent falls back to browser access to read the rendered page; it only reads public pages.
Setup guide
How to Monitor Competitor Mentions
A practical guide to monitoring competitor mentions with an agent: a scheduled sweep, a memory diff, a dated delta report, and approval on every report.
Read the setup guideDon't see your workflow? Describe it.
A sentence or two about a recurring job is enough. We design the playbook that runs it and show you exactly what it saves.