Policy drafting & monitoring
On the schedule you choose, a compliance agent sweeps the regulatory feeds, diffs material changes against your policy library, and drafts a marked-up proposed redraft for an attorney to review and approve. Drafts are not legal advice.
Saves you ~5.3 h / week
How it works
- Trigger
- On the “Policy monitoring sweep” schedule.
- Job
- Sweep the feeds, diff material changes against the library, draft the proposed redraft.
- Outcome
- A sourced policy-change report with proposed updates.
What it installs
Agents 3
-
Compliance Agent
A regulatory-compliance analyst who sweeps the feeds, diffs material changes against the policy library, and drafts marked-up proposed redrafts.
-
Rule Verifier
An adversarial checker who confirms each cited rule is in force and every citation is traceable before the redraft proceeds to attorney review.
-
Policy drafting & monitoring Quality Reviewer
Checks primary evidence, domain controls, deliverable completeness, and communication quality, stopping the run when the work is wrong, unsupported, incomplete, or uncertain.
Teams 1
-
Policy Compliance Desk
A compliance analyst who monitors, diffs, and drafts proposed redrafts, paired with a rule verifier who confirms currency and citation provenance before anything reaches the attorney.
Workflows 1
-
Sweep, diff, redraft, verify, approve
Sweep the feeds, diff material changes against the library, draft the proposed redraft, verify rule currency, and hand off for attorney approval.
Documents 1
-
Policy library
The set of policies the agent monitors and diffs against — name, scope, owner, regulatory basis, and jurisdictional footprint — plus the regulators and feeds you want watched. You maintain it; the agent reads it as input.
Goals 1
-
Policies current
Keep the policy library aligned with current regulation. Success looks like: Every material regulatory change detected in a cycle is diffed against the library, and each resulting gap has a verified, attorney-approved proposed redraft.
Skills 4
-
reg-feed-watcher
Sweep regulatory feeds (Federal Register API, regulator RSS, public web) since the last check and classify each item by materiality — always-material / review-worthy / FYI — logging comment deadlines for NPRMs and ANPR/RFI items and tagging every citation by source. The filter is the value: unfiltered feeds are noise. Adapted from anthropics/claude-for-legal/reg-feed-watcher.
-
policy-diff
Diff a specific regulatory change against the indexed policy library: verify rule status first, extract each discrete requirement, map it to the closest policy, and classify the gap (none / partial / full) with the specific change needed, owner, effort, and risk. A negative finding against the wrong policy is a routing problem, not a compliance analysis. Adapted from anthropics/claude-for-legal/policy-diff.
-
policy-redraft
Produce a marked-up proposed redraft that closes a diffed gap: smallest-possible edit, struck/inserted redlines with an inline rationale per change, verify tags carried through, written to a dated proposal file — never to the live policy — and never closing the gap in the tracker. The gap closes only when the owner applies and approves. Adapted from anthropics/claude-for-legal/policy-redraft.
-
reg-gap-analysis
Diff a new regulation or guidance against current governance posture and produce a prioritized remediation plan: scope (does it apply — jurisdiction, threshold, builder vs deployer), extract requirements by category, diff against current state, prioritize by hard-deadline / prohibited-practice / effort-to-impact / use-case overlap, and split into must-do / should-do / already-compliant / accepted gaps. Adapted from anthropics/claude-for-legal/reg-gap-analysis.
Schedules 1
-
Policy monitoring sweep
Sweeps regulatory feeds, diffs material changes against the policy library, and drafts proposed redrafts for attorney approval on the schedule you choose. ## Professional quality control Objective: complete the recurring Policy drafting & monitoring operating cycle and deliver a review-ready, evidence-backed result rather than merely report that the schedule ran. Start by fixing the review period, reading the current source records and prior run, confirming required access, and listing missing or contradictory inputs. Execute the bundle's full authored method in order, retaining source, calculation, command, or before/after evidence for load-bearing findings. Separate facts from interpretation, apply supplied policy without inventing thresholds, and stop any branch that requires missing authority or an unconfirmed human rule. Produce the complete named deliverable plus an evidence record, assumptions, exceptions, unresolved questions, and concrete next actions with owners where the method calls for them. Run the workflow's independent verifier checks and fix failures before requesting approval. The task is done only when every requested section and quality criterion passes or a blocker is explicit; silence, inaccessible data, or polished prose is not proof of completion. Verify quoted language verbatim, source authority, pinpoint citation, jurisdiction, effective date, party, and contract direction. Distinguish law, contract text, internal policy, and recommendation; never make the human's legal decision. Drafting must be precise and direct, without generic AI phrasing, invented precedent, vague legalism, or certainty beyond the cited authority. The human retains authority over publication, sending, spend, signing, merging, deployment, and other consequential external actions.
Folders 1
-
Policy library
Requirements
- Web search and fetch access for regulatory feeds — The agent monitors regulatory feeds (the Federal Register API, regulator RSS, and the public web) through worker web search and fetch tools, and pauses for your approval on every redraft. It reads public sources only.
- Browser access for paywalled or JS-heavy regulator sites (fallback) — When a regulator's docket or a feed is behind a login or renders only in a browser, the agent falls back to browser access to read the rendered page; it only reads, never files.
Setup guide
How to Automate Policy Drafting and Monitoring
A practical guide to monitoring regulatory change, diffing policy gaps, and drafting proposed redlines for attorney approval.
Read the setup guideDon't see your workflow? Describe it.
A sentence or two about a recurring job is enough. We design the playbook that runs it and show you exactly what it saves.