NanoCorp Alternatives Where Withdrawing Your Own Money Is Free

There is a particular moment when a platform's pricing page stops being abstract: the day you try to take your own money out. Plenty of autonomous-company tools are cheap or free to run, and the real price only shows up at the exit, as a percentage of the revenue your business earned.

NanoCorp is the clearest case. The pitch is impressive: describe the business you wish existed, and its agents build a live product with a landing page, an app, and a database, set up payments and a custom domain, then prospect, email customers, run Meta ads, and send you daily reports while you steer by chat. It claims 96% of its businesses ship a live site. The entry pricing is friendly too: a 3-day free trial with no card, then a Founder plan at $30 a month with rolling credits and custom domains.

The catch is a 20% fee on money you withdraw. The company your agents built earns revenue into infrastructure NanoCorp provisioned and holds, the domain, the payments, the app itself, and taking your earnings out costs a fifth of them. That is the term worth shopping against.

The fee is half the story, custody is the other half

The withdrawal fee gets the attention, but it only works because of the provisioning model behind it. During the trial your company lives on a nanocorp.app domain with NanoCorp email. Payments flow through accounts the platform stands up rather than accounts you brought. The one-description launch and the exit fee are the same design: everything is theirs to provision, so the money passes through them on the way to you.

When comparing alternatives, ask two questions. Does this platform take a percentage of your money anywhere, at earn time or at withdrawal time? And if you leave in a year, do the domain, the payments account, and the code come with you?

The alternatives sort into three groups on those questions.

Group one: still a cut, just a different shape

Polsia is the most prominent name in this lane. It goes further than NanoCorp on provisioning: its terms describe it creating repositories, databases, hosting, and app builds for you and running advertising, outreach, and subscription enforcement on a schedule you approve once. The money model is a sibling of NanoCorp's: a subscription whose price is not published, plus 3% of every customer payment and 20% of ad spend. NanoCorp charges you when money leaves. Polsia charges you as money arrives. If the withdrawal fee is what sent you searching, Polsia keeps a percentage too.

Group two: no percentage in the pricing, but the platform hosts your company

Cofounder runs your company as hosted agent departments, engineering, sales, marketing, design, finance, and operations, with managers and shared context. Its published pricing is a 7-day free trial, then Cofounder Pro at $120 a month, and nothing in it takes a percentage of your revenue. The trade is custody and control of the stack: Cofounder manages your GitHub, Supabase, and Vercel until you graduate and claim them, its approval model covers a narrow list of dangerous actions like incorporating an LLC or opening a bank account, and you cannot bring your own model subscription such as Claude Code or Codex.

MakerPad ships a self-running company with five tools wired in today: AI coding agents, Stripe checkout, ad campaigns, cold email, and SEO page generation. It publishes no pricing on its site, so the cost of leaving is a question to ask before you start, and the operation runs on the platform's tools and conventions.

Group three: no cut, and the accounts are yours

win.sh is explicit about both questions. There is no revenue share and no withdrawal fee, pricing is a self-serve monthly budget from $50 to $10,000 with a cap and dollar-based receipts, and it connects to accounts you already own, with Stripe, Plausible, and Google Search Console live today. It keeps the autonomous shape NanoCorp fans like, a 24/7 loop with a morning brief, while gating risky moves like spend and outreach behind approvals. Its honest tradeoff is that it is autonomy-first: the loop runs before you ask, and your control surface is reviewing decisions it already proposed or made within your rules.

Task Machine sits in the same group on money and custody, with a different answer on control. You keep 100% of your revenue, Task Machine takes no cut, and it never custodies your accounts, so there is no withdrawal fee and agents act through accounts you own. The difference is that Task Machine is control-first: you direct work in Chat, everything that needs your judgment lands in one Inbox before it ships, and recurring work runs as deterministic workflows with approval and verifier steps and step-level logs you can read afterward.

The comparison in one table

Prices and features were checked against each vendor's own pages on 6 October 2026.

Who should pick what

If the one-description launch is the thing you value and a fifth of your withdrawals is an acceptable convenience fee, NanoCorp remains the fastest route from sentence to shipped company, and nothing on this list matches that speed. If you want the always-on loop without any cut, win.sh is the closest match in spirit. If you want hosted departments at a flat subscription with no percentage, Cofounder fits, custody included until you graduate.

Task Machine is the right alternative if the lesson you took from the withdrawal fee is broader than the fee itself: that a business should run on accounts you hold, earn money that is entirely yours, and give you the decision before the risky step rather than a briefing after it. It is the wrong alternative if you want a company that stands itself up in two minutes with nothing to connect, because bringing your own accounts is exactly the setup NanoCorp exists to remove.

The direct comparison is on the Task Machine vs NanoCorp page. To run recurring work on accounts that stay yours, start a 7-day trial.